Stop misleading housing bills

By Linda Koelling : smdailyjournal – excerpt
Editor,

If you think that Senate bills 9 and 10 are the answer to the affordable housing needs, I invite you to consider the facts. Housing affordability and homelessness are said to be among the most critical issues facing California cities. The Legislature continues to introduce housing bills that remove local zoning control from cities and evade citizen input.

The results of these bills will create significant, environmental impacts. Where will the funds come from for municipalities’ ability to provide and maintain the additional infrastructure, and public services required for water, schools, sewer treatment, roads, police, fire? Can we expect an increase in taxes to meet the requirements for the additional infrastructure needs? If so, then what is the use of having affordable housing when the cost of living in the area will be too high for anyone to handle. It makes no sense!…

SB 9 AND SB 10 FACTS:

SB 9: Ends single-family zoning;

SB 9: Allows 4-6 units of housing on single-family lots;

SB 9: Allows the splitting of every single-family lot in California;

SB 10: Allows up to 10 units per parcel in any residential area (job-rich, transit-rich) ;

SB 10: Allows local councils to remove any land use initiative without the vote of the people;

SB 9 SB 10: Cause mass removal of our trees;

SB 9 SB 10: Eliminate yards and permeable soil protection;

SB 9 SB 10: No affordable units required;

SB 9 SB 10: No infrastructure upgrades required; and

SB 9 SB 10: No CEQA environmental review required.

Who are our leaders really representing? No on SB 9 and SB 10

Linda Koelling, Foster City

The letter writer is the former mayor of Foster City…(more)

SB9 is the brainchild of Senator Atkins and Senator Winer gets credit for comping up with SB10. Together they will spell the death knell of the single family homes and neighborhoods in our state and make the security of home ownership more difficult for anyone who is not lucky enough to own a home yet. SB10 will remove citizen’s ability to enforce ballot initiatives that their local authorities don’t approve of. And this doesn’t event take into account what the Assembly is cooking up for us.

Redding Costco opponents taking fight to court

By David Benda, Redding Searchlight redding. – excerpt

Corrections & Clarification: The Bonnyview Bechelli Coalition is the group challenging the city’s approval of the Costco project. This story has been updated to reflect that.

Costco Warehouse’s controversial plan to relocate its store in Redding is facing another obstacle.

Opponents have notified the city they are moving forward with a lawsuit to challenge the project’s approval under the California Environmental Quality Act. The notice of commencement of action was filed Tuesday in Shasta County Superior Court…

Mark Wolfe, a San Francisco land-use attorney, is representing the Bonnyview Bechelli Coalition in the lawsuit. Wolfe didn’t immediately return a phone message seeking comment…

Wolfe also represents the Pleasanton Citizens for Responsible Growth. That group for the second time sued the city of Pleasanton in March, a month after the city council unanimously approved a new Costco near Interstate 680, according to news reports…

RELATED LINKS:

https://www.protectceqa.org/ 
http://www.mrwolfeassociates.com/firm.html  
https://www.facebook.com/protectceqa/ 
https://www.facebook.com/nocostcoonbechelli/posts/the-bonnyview-bechelli-coalition-needs-your-help-the-proposed-river-crossing-mar/827128224292821/

How to Destroy a Single Family Neighborhood

https://youtu.be/_tEFEVXggCw

Amherst Drive between SMO and WLA By Chris LeGras

The future meets the past on this street in Santa Monica. Note the lack of cars parked on the street and the lack of traffic in the old neighborhood., safe wide streets and sidewalks. The Building opportunity bills are meant to hasten the pace of change by removing the residents’ rights.