This is an URGENT call to action. SB 7 is a terrible bill, and it needs to be opposed before it’s next heard on 6/26. Letters and calls should be in ASAP. Today if possible. After a district court ruled against SB9 for Charter Cities, the density dogs have been working on a work around.
RELATED: COURT THROWS OUT PRO-DENSITY LAW SB9
What is the Problem with SB 7? This is a housing bill that makes HCD stronger and RHNA worse. SB7 takes recommendations from a 176 page report — “California’s Housing Future 2040: The Next Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)” — sent to legislators just two months ago, and hastily tries to get them passed into law in the next few weeks.
Through a sneaky process called “gut and amend,” new language has been put into SB 7 — which already passed the Senate in another form — and is now working its way through the Assembly.
No underlying problems of 6th cycle RHNA are addressed. This bill relies on unsubstantiated claims about the state’s housing crisis to justify usurping local control.
The 6th cycle RHNA is not even mid-way through, and all cities are failing its metrics. The solid reasons why are heavily documented — to the point that a housing element audit was recently authorized to examine the process.
The HCD is doing an end run around the audit and any flaws it might uncover; the new language of SB 7 bolsters their powers for 7th cycle RHNA, and they want it done now.
WHAT HCD GETS WITH SB 7:
- An increase in authority, zero oversight, no transparency
- Heavier hand against cities, bolstered by new punitive legislation
- Further control over local zoning control
- Eliminates the right to appeal RHNA mandates
- Allows unchecked lobbyist influence
- Continue to disregard infrastructure costs and other impacts to cities
- Continue to disregard actual data, including population projections that show California’s numbers flat through 2060
- Inclusion of open space in their calculation for how much new development a jurisdiction can absorb
- No requirement to base policy on robust economic theory
- No requirement to base RHNA mandates on legitimate population projections
- RHNA allocations will continue to increase market rate housing
- RHNA will require — but not advance — affordability.
- Unelected bureaucrats will continue creating policy with no accountability
THIS IS HAPPENING FAST:
SB7 is being rushed through without due diligence.
This “gut and amend” bill bypassed normal deadlines, and showed up at the last minute. In the Senate it was an innocuous bill about group housing.
June 10th: Amended in Assembly
June 18th: Passed Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee
June 26th: Up for a vote in the Local Government committee
your message can be this simple: I OPPOSE SB 7.
Contact for direct representatives are below, they also need to hear from us.
| First | Last | Phone | ||
| Chair, D | Juan | Carrillo | juan.carrillo | (916) 319-2039 |
| V-Chair, R | Marie | Waldron | marie.waldron | (916) 319-2075 |
| R | Bill | Essayli | bill.essayli | (916) 319-2063 |
| D | Matt | Haney | matt.haney | (916) 319-2017 |
| D | Ash | Kalra | ash.kalra | (916) 319-2025 |
| D | Blanca | Pacheco | blanca.pacheco | (916) 319-2064 |
| D | James | Ramos | james.ramos | (916) 319-2045 |
| D | Chris | Ward | assemblymember.Ward | (916) 319-2078 |
| D | Lori | Wilson | lori.wilson | (916) 319-2011 |
| Chief Cons. | Angela | Mapp | angela.mapp | (916) 319-3958 |
Oppose SB 7 or download the editable doc file: Oppose SB 7
Recipients: juan.carrillo@asm.ca.gov, marie.waldron@asm.ca.gov, bill.essayli@asm.ca.gov, matt.haney@asm.ca.gov, ash.kalra@asm.ca.gov, blanca.pacheco@asm.ca.gov, james.ramos@asm.ca.gov, assemblymember.Ward@assembly.ca.gov, lori.wilson@asm.ca.gov, angela.mapp@asm.ca.gov